Notes From The Circus

Notes From The Circus

Share this post

Notes From The Circus
Notes From The Circus
Clear Thinking v. Andrew Wilson
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Clear Thinking v. Andrew Wilson

The Face of Intellectual Evil

Mike Brock's avatar
Mike Brock
May 30, 2025
∙ Paid
23

Share this post

Notes From The Circus
Notes From The Circus
Clear Thinking v. Andrew Wilson
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
3
3
Share
Image: Andrew Wilson debates Naima on Whatever Debates

This is, after all, a philosophy blog.

Earlier this week, I subjected myself to nearly four hours of what was billed as a debate on feminism between Andrew Wilson and a USC student named Naima on the Whatever YouTube channel. I made extensive notes throughout, documenting what I witnessed—not a philosophical exchange but something far more disturbing: the systematic weaponization of rational discourse against reason itself.

I watched a man weaponize the forms of rational discourse against reason itself. I have witnessed someone perform philosophical sophistication while systematically destroying the very possibility of philosophical inquiry. I have seen entropy dressed in the robes of order, chaos masquerading as clarity, intellectual violence disguised as rigorous thinking.

His name is Andrew Wilson, and he represents something more dangerous than the evasions of Jordan Peterson, more corrosive than the simplistic selfishness of Ayn Rand, more insidious than the obscurantism of Curtis Yarvin. Wilson doesn't just advocate for bad ideas—he corrupts the epistemic foundations that would allow us to recognize them as bad ideas at all.

This isn't merely philosophical disagreement. This is what Hannah Arendt called “the banality of evil” in its conversational form—the cool, detached confidence of someone who knows how to win arguments while evacuating them of moral seriousness. Wilson has mastered the art of using reason's own tools to destroy reason, of employing logic's methods to undermine logic's authority.

When I call Andrew Wilson the face of intellectual evil, I don't use the term lightly. Evil, in this context, isn't melodramatic hyperbole—it's a precise philosophical diagnosis. Wilson represents the systematic inversion of intellectual virtue: where philosophy should clarify, he obfuscates; where reason should illuminate, he creates darkness; where argument should seek truth, he manufactures submission.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Notes From The Circus to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Mike Brock
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More