We discussed the rule of law. Or the lack thereof.
And how the opposition needs to get serious about restoring it.
That means refusing to look past the crimes playing out in plain view. It means confronting the corruption of the courts, the weaponization of federal power, and the moral cowardice that calls itself restraint. It means understanding that accountability is not vengeance—it’s the precondition of legitimate government.
We talked about what happens when liberal institutions mistake professionalism for principle, when journalists and lawyers and executives decide that keeping their positions matters more than keeping the Republic. And we asked the question no one in Washington seems willing to face: What does fidelity to the Constitution require when the law itself is being rewritten to serve the lawless?
