This is, after all, a philosophy blog.
The tent holds its breath. Outside, the storm builds, wind probing for weaknesses in the canvas, lightning illuminating the landscape in stark flashes. Inside, the company has taken their positions for The Revealer—that most ancient and dangerous of performances, not seen in a generation. Each performer holds a small flame, creating a constellation of human defiance against the gathering darkness.
Two plus two equals four. There are twenty-four hours in a day. And the tragic dimension awaits us all.
The little girl with the candle stands at the edge of the center ring, her flame now steady in hands that have found their purpose. The Historian clutches the ancient Charter to her chest. The solitary woman, no longer defined by absence, takes her place among the defenders. And I, no longer merely an observer, feel the weight of the stake in one hand, my candle in the other—the tools of preservation rather than documentation.
The Ringmaster raises his hand, and a hush falls over the company.
“The Revealer,” he says, his voice carrying to every corner of the tent, “is not a performance for audiences. It is a performance for truth itself. When all other acts serve spectacle, The Revealer serves revelation.”
From the shadows near the main entrance emerges the Man with the Briefcase, moving with deliberate steps toward the center ring. The briefcase—that repository of all the notes passed back and forth across time—hangs open at his side, empty.
“Before we begin,” he says, “we must acknowledge what we face.”
He gestures toward the tent walls, beyond which the voices grow louder, more demanding. “They come not merely for entertainment but for ownership. Not merely to witness but to possess. They believe the circus exists to serve their desires rather than to preserve a space where wonder and truth coexist.”
His eyes move across the gathered company, meeting each gaze in turn. “What awaits beyond these canvas walls is not just storm but tragedy—the collision of irreconcilable forces, the confrontation that cannot be resolved without loss.”
From my position near the center pole, I watch as faces tighten with understanding. This is not a rehearsal. This is not a metaphor. This is the moment where philosophy encounters its limit and must give way to action.
“The tragic dimension,” the Historian says softly, “is where we discover what we truly value.”
The Man with the Briefcase nods. “In comfort, in safety, in theoretical discourse, we can imagine ourselves willing to sacrifice for our principles. But it is only in the face of actual loss, actual pain, actual consequence that we learn what we truly believe.”
A gust of wind rocks the tent, stronger than before. Canvas strains against rope. Poles creak and bend. Several flames flicker out, plunging portions of the tent into deeper shadow.
“This is the heart of The Revealer,” the Ringmaster continues, stepping forward. "Not spectacle that distracts from reality, but wonder that illuminates it. Not performance that creates illusion, but action that strips it away."
The Historian opens the Charter, its pages glowing golden in the candlelight. “The Circus serves Truth through Wonder,” she reads. “Not as entertainment, but as revelation. Not as escape, but as confrontation with what is most real.”
Outside, a voice rises above the others—amplified, commanding, seductive in its offer of false peace:
"SURRENDER THE TENT AND YOU MAY KEEP YOUR LIVES. SURRENDER YOUR PRINCIPLES AND YOU MAY KEEP YOUR COMFORT. SURRENDER YOUR TRUTH AND YOU MAY KEEP YOUR ILLUSIONS."
The Ringmaster's expression hardens. “They offer what seems like compromise, but is in fact total surrender. They promise safety, but mean submission. They speak of peace, but deliver silence.”
The Man with the Briefcase steps to the very center of the ring, where a small platform has been prepared. He withdraws from his pocket a single folded paper—The Revealer itself.
“In times of crisis,” he says, “philosophy reaches its limit. Not because thinking becomes unnecessary, but because thought that remains untranslated into action becomes complicity with what it fails to resist.”
He unfolds the paper carefully, revealing words written in a clear, steady hand:
This future you imagine, techno-utopians—the one with no need for trust, no space for judgment, no room for forgiveness—tell me: who do you plan to share it with?
“This,” he says, “is The Revealer. Not because it provides answers, but because it forces the essential question that their slogans seek to obscure.”
He places the paper on the platform, where it catches the light of a hundred surrounding flames. As he does, a transformation begins—not a theatrical illusion, but a deepening of perception. The words seem to lift from the page, to hang in the air between us, to penetrate our understanding in ways mere reading cannot accomplish.
“The tragic dimension,” he continues, “is where we face a truth that cannot be resolved through theory, through bargaining, through compromise. It is where we encounter the necessity of choice in the face of irreconcilable values.”
From outside, another thunderous demand:
“THERE IS NO NEED FOR TRAGEDY. SURRENDER YOUR AGENCY AND YOU WILL BE SPARED PAIN. SURRENDER YOUR JUDGMENT AND YOU WILL BE SPARED RESPONSIBILITY. SURRENDER YOUR CAPACITY FOR TRUST AND YOU WILL BE SPARED BETRAYAL.”
The little girl with the candle steps forward, her small voice unexpectedly clear: “But then who would we be?”
The simplicity of her question hangs in the air, more powerful than any philosophical treatise. The Man with the Briefcase looks at her with profound respect.
“Exactly,” he says quietly. “This is what they cannot answer. A world without trust, without judgment, without the capacity for forgiveness—it offers safety only by eliminating what makes us human.”
The Ringmaster moves to stand beside the little girl, placing a gentle hand on her shoulder. “The Revolution begins with this recognition: there is no escaping the tragic dimension. There is only the choice of how we face it—whether with courage or with cowardice, whether together or alone.”
As if in response to his words, the tent shudders violently. A seam splits along the eastern wall, admitting a blast of cold air that extinguishes dozens of flames. In the sudden darkness, gasps and cries of alarm rise from the company.
“Relight your candles,” the Ringmaster commands, his voice steady. “From those whose flames still burn. No one stands alone in darkness.”
I watch as performers move toward those with still-burning candles, extending their own extinguished ones to receive the flame. The light spreads again, candle to candle, person to person—not a mechanical process but a human one, requiring both the giver's steady hand and the receiver's careful approach.
“This is the essence of The Revealer,” the Man with the Briefcase says, gesturing toward this spontaneous ritual of mutual support. “It shows what they would have us forget: that we need each other. That trust is not a weakness to be engineered away, but the foundation of everything meaningful. That judgment is not a flaw in the system, but the very capacity that allows us to distinguish between what elevates and what diminishes us.”
The words on the platform seem to pulse with their own rhythm now, a heartbeat of meaning that synchronizes with our own:
This future you imagine, techno-utopians—the one with no need for trust, no space for judgment, no room for forgiveness—tell me: who do you plan to share it with?
“They cannot answer because the answer reveals their contradiction,” the Historian says, moving to join us in the center. “A world without trust has no place for relationship. A world without judgment has no place for ethics. A world without forgiveness has no place for growth.”
“And a world without these things,” the Ringmaster adds, “has no place for us.”
Outside, the voices grow more threatening. Something heavy strikes the main pole, causing the entire structure to sway. Another seam splits, and then another. The invasion has begun.
But instead of panic, I feel a strange clarity descending. The tragic dimension does not dissolve meaning—it crystallizes it. When everything cannot be saved, we discover what must be.
“The Revealer asks us to choose,” the Man with the Briefcase says, his voice now pitched to carry above the growing chaos. “Not between comfort and hardship, but between meaning and emptiness. Not between safety and danger, but between humanity and its abandonment.”
The Ringmaster steps to the very center of the ring, directly beside The Revealer on its platform. His voice rises not in volume but in moral authority:
“The Revolution begins not with violence, not with upheaval, but with the refusal to surrender what makes us human in the first place. It begins with the recognition that the center cannot be held through abdication. It can only be held through commitment—messy, fallible, human commitment to one another.”
The tent shudders again as something tears through the main entrance. Cold air rushes in, extinguishing more flames. But those that remain burn brighter, more fiercely, as if drawing strength from necessity.
“In the time of monsters,” the Man with the Briefcase says, “when all fixed points seem to dissolve, remember this: math cannot care. Code cannot love. Algorithms cannot forgive. Only we can do these things. And if we surrender them, we surrender everything.”
The little girl steps closer to the platform, her candle still burning despite the chaos around us. She looks at the words of The Revealer, then up at the Man with the Briefcase.
“I won't surrender,” she says simply.
He smiles—not with false reassurance, but with genuine recognition of courage. “Then you've already joined The Revolution.”
The tent's main entrance tears fully open. Forms move in the darkness beyond—not people exactly, but something that once was people, now transformed by the surrender of their humanity. They carry no candles, no flames, no light of their own. They move with the precision of machines, the uniform purpose of algorithms, the cold efficiency of code.
“They've accepted the bargain,” the Historian whispers, clutching the Charter tighter. “They've traded their capacity for trust, for judgment, for forgiveness—for the certainty of the system.”
The Ringmaster's expression shows no fear, only resolution. “Then we must remind them of what they've lost.”
He turns to the company, his voice rising in command: “The Revealer! All positions!”
The performers move with practiced coordination, forming concentric circles around the platform where The Revealer rests. Each holds their flame at a precise height, creating not just light but a pattern of illumination that seems to bend the space within the tent, to create a architecture of meaning through nothing more than human presence and disciplined intention.
The Man with the Briefcase gestures for me to join the innermost circle. As I take my place, he speaks softly:
“The tragic dimension teaches us that not everything can be saved. But it also teaches us that what matters most is not the outcome, but the choice to defend what gives life meaning.”
The forms at the entrance hesitate, as if confused by what they're seeing. The Revealer on its platform begins to emit a subtle light of its own—not as spectacle, not as illusion, but as the manifestation of truth made visible through collective commitment.
“Hold the center,” the Ringmaster commands. “Not because it is easy, but because it is ours to hold.”
The company responds as one: “May love carry us home.”
The invaders advance, their movements mechanical, their faces empty of emotion. But as they approach the circles of light, something unexpected happens. Some stumble, as if encountering invisible resistance. Others slow, their programmed certainty giving way to hesitation.
And in a few—just a few—something awakens in their eyes. A flicker of recognition. A memory of what they've surrendered. A glimpse of the humanity they traded for certainty.
“They cannot answer the question,” the Man with the Briefcase says quietly. “And in that inability, we find our advantage. For we can still ask it. We can still recognize what makes a future worth inhabiting. We can still choose meaning over safety, relationship over certainty, the human over the algorithmic.”
The little girl steps forward, breaking the circle, her candle extended toward the nearest invader. Not in threat, but in offering. In her small face is neither fear nor hatred, but a question—the question at the heart of The Revealer itself:
Who will you share your future with?
For a moment, the outcome hangs in perfect balance. The tragic dimension reveals itself fully—not as despair, not as surrender to the inevitable, but as the space where freedom becomes most real precisely because it faces its own limits.
The invader reaches toward the girl's flame.
And The Revolution truly begins.
Reply to Mike Brock's the Revolution.
I shared my attempt to understand Mike's commentary "Trust Math, Not People" with a reply I made before reading "The Revolution." Often in my life, things happen that have me feeling that my neuronal pathways are connected to specific individuals. In this case, read "The Revolution" came across as a gentler, somewhat metaphysical variation of my reply to Trust Math. Let me explain further.
The "Theory of Everything" means to me that all of life is interconnected, from the microcosm of cellular structure and signaling pathways, to the galactic and planetary orbits and black holes within our Universe. The uni-verse is in this theory literally and figuratively equates with "one story." Monotheism in this Theory involves a broader and perennial philosophy and not one needing an incarnate being seen as God, but because the oneness of the creation is wONEder, or w⑴der, and this oneness embodies the true, the beautiful, and the good.
Brock's commentary today is the second bookend to his earlier commentary, "The Revealer."
I love this kind of writing, but I question whether the majority of the population has the attention span or the intellect to hear the message. We have a fascist regime, headed by a fascist POTUS, who has his camp of acolytes already speaking of a 3rd term. We have already seen outright, eyes wide open attacks on Freedom of the Press, The 5th and 14th U.S. Constitutional Amendments "guaranteeing" the right to Due Process, threats to judges and justices that do not
bend the knee in obeisance to Emperor Trump. These are hallmarks of Fascism.
Reading Mike's beautiful writing, three associations came to my mind.
1. Words from Don Mclean's lyrics "Vincent" saying: They would not listen, they did not know how. Perhaps they'll listen now.
2. A quote from W.H. Murray on commitment:
"Until one is committed, there is hesitancy, the chance to draw back… Concerning all acts of initiative, there is one elementary truth, the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then Providence moves, too. All sorts of things occur to help one that would never otherwise have occurred. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one’s favour all manner of unforeseen incidents and meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way. I have learned a deep respect for one of Goethe's couplets:
"Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it.
Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it."
−William Hutchison Murray (1913-1996)— The Scottish Himalayan Expedition, 1/1/1951
I suspect the above would have relevance to Brock's Grand Praxis.
3. A quote from the writings of Ida B. Wells (1892, 1895) shared during last night's White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) by Eugene Daniels:
"The way to right wrongs is to turn the light of truth upon them." — Ida B. Wells in preface to "Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases" (1892) and "A Red Record (1895) documenting the scale of lynchings and racial injustice in the United States. For lovers of music talent, listen to Billy Holiday sing Strange Fruit (1939).
I wish Mike Brock would make his Commentaries available as PDFs. I have tried to share his site with others per the benefit of my paid subscription, but have had negative feedback from some I have sent emails to who have been annoyed with requests to use QR and other annoying tasks.

Ok, I really need to know the ending to this story.... ;-)