The Crisis, No. 8
The empire of exit and the conspiracy against America
The Director of National Intelligence stood in the parking lot of the Fulton County Elections Hub while FBI agents loaded boxes onto trucks.
Tulsi Gabbard, in a dark blazer, watching men in windbreakers carry cardboard boxes out of a building where American citizens cast their votes five years ago. Hundreds of boxes. Computers. Tabulator tapes. Voter rolls. Seized and loaded.
The Director of National Intelligence has no legitimate role at a domestic law enforcement action. The intelligence community’s remit is foreign threats—the enemies beyond our borders, the spies and saboteurs. An FBI raid on a county election office is a domestic matter, whatever pretext is offered. And yet there she stood.
Senator Mark Warner named the only two possibilities: either Gabbard believes there is a foreign intelligence angle and failed to brief the intelligence committees as required by law, or she is turning the intelligence community into a partisan instrument. There is no third option.
But you do not need the Senator’s analysis. You only need the photograph. The Director of National Intelligence, supervising the seizure of ballots from an election her president lost.
The administration claims she has a “pivotal role in election security.” This is not election security. This is election nullification. The 2020 election happened. The votes were counted. The results were certified. Trump lost Georgia by 11,779 votes. Every audit, every recount, every court challenge confirmed the result.
Five years later.
And now they are seizing the ballots.
⁂
The same week that agents loaded Georgia’s votes onto trucks, the Financial Times reported that Trump administration officials have been holding covert meetings with separatists from Alberta.
Alberta. The province that sits atop the Athabasca oil sands—the third-largest oil reserve on Earth. The province whose eastern border is a thousand miles of prairie, whose western edge rises into the Canadian Rockies, whose people have chafed for decades at Ottawa’s carbon taxes and equalization formulas. Alberta, which has never loved confederation the way Ontario loves it, which has always felt more kinship with Texas than with Quebec.
The Alberta Prosperity Project—a fringe group seeking independence from Canada—has met with State Department officials three times since April. They are now seeking a meeting with Treasury. Their ask: a $500 billion credit facility to bankroll the province if an independence referendum passes.
Five hundred billion dollars. To break apart a NATO ally.
The State Department’s response: “The department regularly meets with civil society types.”
Civil society types. That is what they call people seeking foreign backing to dismember a neighboring democracy.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent went on a podcast last week and described Alberta as “a natural partner for the US.” He mentioned the “rumour” of a referendum—a rumour his own administration is helping to create. “The Albertans are very independent people,” he said.
David Eby, the premier of British Columbia, named it correctly: “To go to a foreign country and to ask for assistance in breaking up Canada, there’s an old-fashioned word for that. And that word is treason.”
But the treason is not only on the Canadian side. American officials are entertaining these meetings. American officials are planting these suggestions. American officials are offering exit.
⁂
I wrote in Crisis No. 2 about the network state ideology—the intellectual framework developed by Balaji Srinivasan, funded by Andreessen and Sacks and Thiel, which treats democratic accountability as an obstacle to be escaped. The core premise is exit: if you do not like the rules of the nation-state you inhabit, you should be free to leave, to form your own jurisdiction, to purchase sovereignty elsewhere.
This ideology has now become foreign policy.
The administration is not invading Canada. That is the old imperialism—boots on the ground, flags planted, territory seized. This is the new imperialism. The empire of exit does not conquer. It offers alternatives. It makes loyalty to existing institutions seem irrational. It whispers: why stay in Canada when America will pay you to leave? Why accept the constraints of your federation when you can exit into ours?
The exit door leads into another room. Alberta would not gain independence. It would gain a new master who promises better terms—for now, while the courtship lasts, while the acquisition is not yet complete. The freedom on offer is the freedom to be acquired.
This is what the network state ideologues dreamed of, back when they were writing manifestos and holding conferences in Singapore. They imagined a world where capital could escape democratic constraint, where the wealthy could shop for jurisdictions the way they shop for tax havens, where sovereignty itself became a market.
Now they are implementing it. With the resources of the American state. Against a NATO ally.
⁂
And in Minneapolis, the occupation continues.
There is a video of Gregory Bovino, the Border Patrol chief who commanded the Minneapolis operation until this week, giving a pep talk to his agents. An agent asks him, “Whose city is it, chief?”
Bovino answers: “It’s fucking ours. It’s our fucking city.”
The city belongs to them—not to its residents, not to its elected officials, not to the citizens who built it and live in it and pay taxes to maintain its streets. It belongs to the men with guns and badges who have been sent to pacify it.
Bovino has been removed from Minneapolis. Not because of what his agents did—the door-kicking raids, the warrantless searches, the smashed car windows, the two dead citizens. He was removed because of what he said. The administration needed a different face for the same operation. Tom Homan has been dispatched to “lower the temperature” while continuing the occupation.
This is not a course correction. It is a rebrand.
⁂
I was told last week that Minneapolis brought this upon itself. That state and local officials “thwarted the legitimate enforcement of federal immigration laws” and therefore the occupation is their fault. That they “stoked public outrage” and are now reaping what they sowed.
I asked a simple question: Are you saying the administration had no choice but to do this? Was this their only available course of action?
No answer. A change of subject. Something about legal frameworks and enforcement priorities and the complexity of federalism.
I asked again. No choice? No other way?
No answer. Because the answer is obvious. They had choices. They could have pursued enforcement through the courts. They could have negotiated with local officials. They could have prioritized actual public safety threats rather than conducting dragnet sweeps. They could have declined to send three thousand federal agents into a city of four hundred thousand people.
They chose this. They chose Bovino. They chose the door-kicking raids and the warrantless searches. They chose to make an example of Minneapolis.
The choice reveals the intent. This is not law enforcement. This is punishment.
⁂
In Georgia, the administration is seizing ballots from an election the president lost, with the Director of National Intelligence watching from the parking lot.
In Alberta, the administration is courting separatists with offers of $500 billion to break apart a NATO ally.
In Minneapolis, the administration is occupying a city whose democratic choices displeased the president, and killing citizens who resist.
This is a coherent project. Not chaos. Not incompetence. The systematic dismantling of democratic self-governance—in American cities, in American elections, in allied nations.
The name for this project is conspiracy against America. Not conspiracy as fantasy. Conspiracy as the law understands it: coordinated action to subvert lawful government.
⁂
I use the phrase deliberately. “Conspiracy against the United States” is a federal crime, 18 U.S.C. § 371. It covers conspiracies to defraud the United States or to impede the lawful functions of government.
What do we call it when the government itself becomes the conspiracy? When the agencies created to protect the republic are turned against it? When the intelligence services supervise raids on election offices and the State Department meets with separatists and the Border Patrol chief declares that American cities belong to him?
We call it what it is. A conspiracy against America, conducted by the people who control its government.
The empire of exit is their ideology. They believe sovereignty is negotiable, democratic accountability an obstacle, the constraints of law and constitution legacy code to be refactored. They spent years theorizing this in podcasts and manifestos and venture capital pitch decks. Now they are implementing it.
The conspiracy against America is their method. They are using the instruments of the state to hollow out the state. They are using law enforcement to undermine the rule of law. They are using the intelligence community to surveil democracy itself.
⁂
The Director of National Intelligence, in the parking lot. The boxes being loaded. The ballots inside those boxes—each one a citizen’s voice, cast in good faith, counted and certified and now seized by men who believe that the wrong voices spoke.
Gabbard did not have to be there. Her presence was a choice. A message: we are watching your votes. We are collecting your voices. We are building a file.
Five years after an election. Boxes loaded onto trucks. The intelligence apparatus aimed at the citizens it was created to protect.
⁂
The republic is under attack from within. Minneapolis is occupied. Georgia is raided. Canada is destabilized.
When this is over—and it will be over—there will be an accounting. The receipts are being collected. The names are being documented. The choices are being recorded.
A Border Patrol chief looked at an American city and said: it’s ours.
And for now, until we stop them, he is right.
What happens when MN decides they want to be part of Canada?
Can we presume the original records are preserved somewhere? The obvious play here is to destroy evidence, manufacture evidence, and -- presto! -- announce more corruption. AI rules?