Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Pareja's avatar

A few notes:

First, where do events such as the 1952 CIA-backed Batista coup in Cuba, or the 1945 meeting between Roosevelt and Ibn Saud fit into this? The latter established a relationship between the United States and the Gulf monarchies; the former secured the shipping lane out of the Gulf of Mexico. (For that matter, the 1973 coup in Chile against Salvador Allende.)

Second, why are you calling it the "petro-AI" instead of the "AI-dollar"? The latter would seem to make more sense.

Third: "In 1962 I was a Conservative. I believed privilege could only be justified by service, high taxes on very high incomes were necessary to prevent an entrepreneurial economy becoming a rentier economy, and Keynesian growth would finance public service improvements and a welfare state that steadily reduced inequality. I was suspicious of ideologically driven, large-scale change. These were the mainstream policies of the Macmillan government at the time. In 60 years I have moved from centre right to hard left without changing my opinions."

Fourth: It must be remembered that 1975 was after numerous external shocks, notably the 1967 closure of the Suez Canal and the 1973 OPEC oil embargo (and the 1971 Nixon shock, if you're not in the United States). Keynes managed the UK economy through three major shocks, those being two global wars and a massive economic downturn between them. The lessons had been forgotten a quarter-century later.

LeftButListening's avatar

Fascinating article. You end with " The petro-AI is being born. You are the witness to the transition. You are the relay. End the coup. Or it never ends."

However, I hate it when harbingers of historic journalism issue warnings without any concrete actions to follow.

- Fess up — we all know there's a problem. What the hell do you want us to do about it? Provide clear steps or call to action.

9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?