So you call objectivism stupid, but then say that there’s only one missing piece from Rand’s philosophy for it to be coherent? And then you say that Galt’s message is mute simply because he’s giving it in speech form to others? Crumple this up and throw it in the trash.
So you call objectivism stupid, but then say that there’s only one missing piece from Rand’s philosophy for it to be coherent? And then you say that Galt’s message is mute simply because he’s giving it in speech form to others? Crumple this up and throw it in the trash.
So you call objectivism stupid, but then say that there’s only one missing piece from Rand’s philosophy for it to be coherent? And then you say that Galt’s message is mute simply because he’s giving it in speech form to others? Crumple this up and throw it in the trash.