Have you read John Gray "Two faces of Liberalism"? One of the two faces corresponds pretty exactly to your point on classical liberalism. (The other does not.) It is an interesting book. (Need to re-read it myself, now that this brings it up.)
You’re just trapped in a Cartesian theater created by evolution like the rest of us. Materialism is true on purely thermodynamic grounds, but it is just a lot weirder than the simplified version we get through our evolved senses. See Donald Hoffman.
Have you read John Gray "Two faces of Liberalism"? One of the two faces corresponds pretty exactly to your point on classical liberalism. (The other does not.) It is an interesting book. (Need to re-read it myself, now that this brings it up.)
Of course!
Spot on!
You’re just trapped in a Cartesian theater created by evolution like the rest of us. Materialism is true on purely thermodynamic grounds, but it is just a lot weirder than the simplified version we get through our evolved senses. See Donald Hoffman.
I'm too lazy to respond in a novel way, so I am going to ask AI to summarize what my argument against Cartesianism is. You can see what it said here: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/b873dd9a-c702-43b2-af80-01fb7d83acd5