Yes, correct—unfortunately, the single word doesn’t somehow prove your point.
A legal citizen is still covered by the 1st amendment’s protection of unpopular speech.
And while a green cards can definitely be revoked, that must be done via process by immigration court. Certainly not by an ICE agent on your doorstep asking his superiors on his phone what he should do.
Sure, but not because it’s an unanswered question that the courts need to answer, but rather because citizens must now sue the current administration, utilize the courts, to re-establish the Constitutional freedoms that the executive branch presently ignores (in a variety of ways)
Virtually.
Yes, correct—unfortunately, the single word doesn’t somehow prove your point.
A legal citizen is still covered by the 1st amendment’s protection of unpopular speech.
And while a green cards can definitely be revoked, that must be done via process by immigration court. Certainly not by an ICE agent on your doorstep asking his superiors on his phone what he should do.
I suspect that question will work its way through the courts.
Sure, but not because it’s an unanswered question that the courts need to answer, but rather because citizens must now sue the current administration, utilize the courts, to re-establish the Constitutional freedoms that the executive branch presently ignores (in a variety of ways)