“These aren't fringe academics—they're positioned to implement this doctrine from within.” Their presence in the administrative structure notwithstanding, they are most certainly fringe academics. And referring to them as academics is certainly a stretch. These are intellectual rejects who really have no legitimate place in our government. Otherwise in total agreement with you.
DT seized power once elected. He specifically stated what he intended to do while lying through his teeth about having any knowledge of Project 2025.
I believe the aspect that is causing such confusion is the alacrity of the seizure. Wreaking havoc and causing chaos and more importantly, insecurity and fear, being part of the arsenal they deploy…it was the multi-pronged attack on the entire system, including collateral players, in a coordinated fashion made it hard to wrap yours arms around. That too, is part of the plan…get it done in the first 100 days…before they have time to circle the wagons…at day 87 they seem to be on track, maybe a tad ahead of schedule.
As both a a word nerd and a science nerd, the "unitary executive theory" has always bothered me.
We know from dreadful experience that words, used effectively, can sell almost anything to the general public. When SCOTUS Justices toss around the words "unitary executive theory," it sounds so scholarly! So solemn! So rigorous!
But of course, it's just the Divine Right of Kings dressed up in robes.
The word "theory" adds another layer of pseudo-intellectualism to the phrase, evoking lofty scientific achievements like the Theory of Relativity.
Of course, a "theory" in law does not require the rigor of a "theory" in science, which dare not be named until supported by loads of data and prior established science. In law, it's no more than an attempt to listen in on the echoes of long-ago debates between the drafters of the Constitution.
Or pretend to do so in order to put a veneer of objectivity on the ideological preferences of a Samuel Alito or Bill Barr.
If there had ever been an honest debate about the practical wisdom of this "theory," it should have been forever laid to rest by the presidency of Donald Trump. Now that we know just how disturbed and malicious the occupant of the White House can be, it's unbelievable to me that this "theory" is still being taken seriously. It's time to drive a stake through its heart for good.
Excellent writings. Thank you.
“These aren't fringe academics—they're positioned to implement this doctrine from within.” Their presence in the administrative structure notwithstanding, they are most certainly fringe academics. And referring to them as academics is certainly a stretch. These are intellectual rejects who really have no legitimate place in our government. Otherwise in total agreement with you.
If you have something to say just say it. No need to piggyback.
So appreciate the clarity and morality
DT seized power once elected. He specifically stated what he intended to do while lying through his teeth about having any knowledge of Project 2025.
I believe the aspect that is causing such confusion is the alacrity of the seizure. Wreaking havoc and causing chaos and more importantly, insecurity and fear, being part of the arsenal they deploy…it was the multi-pronged attack on the entire system, including collateral players, in a coordinated fashion made it hard to wrap yours arms around. That too, is part of the plan…get it done in the first 100 days…before they have time to circle the wagons…at day 87 they seem to be on track, maybe a tad ahead of schedule.
Be loyal to the truth, not their narrative!
Correct. Superb comment.
The first I’d heard of this term was just days ago.
Steve Bannon used it when being interviewed by Bill Mahar while discussing the Constitution.
Thanks Mike for providing the philosophical context that packs a fascist punch.
To be forewarned helps us all to see the punch coming 🥊 🙏
I saw that.
As both a a word nerd and a science nerd, the "unitary executive theory" has always bothered me.
We know from dreadful experience that words, used effectively, can sell almost anything to the general public. When SCOTUS Justices toss around the words "unitary executive theory," it sounds so scholarly! So solemn! So rigorous!
But of course, it's just the Divine Right of Kings dressed up in robes.
The word "theory" adds another layer of pseudo-intellectualism to the phrase, evoking lofty scientific achievements like the Theory of Relativity.
Of course, a "theory" in law does not require the rigor of a "theory" in science, which dare not be named until supported by loads of data and prior established science. In law, it's no more than an attempt to listen in on the echoes of long-ago debates between the drafters of the Constitution.
Or pretend to do so in order to put a veneer of objectivity on the ideological preferences of a Samuel Alito or Bill Barr.
If there had ever been an honest debate about the practical wisdom of this "theory," it should have been forever laid to rest by the presidency of Donald Trump. Now that we know just how disturbed and malicious the occupant of the White House can be, it's unbelievable to me that this "theory" is still being taken seriously. It's time to drive a stake through its heart for good.
Super clear and so very important for us all to understand. I’ve posted the link everywhere I have an account. Thank you!