Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John C Rains's avatar

This is way too important for you to only have 37 likes. So, what to do?

Expand full comment
Daniel Pareja's avatar

The complicity of other governments in this cannot be overlooked.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c89vjj0lxx9o

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/23/norway-to-increase-minimum-age-limit-on-social-media-to-15-to-protect-children

When Australia and Norway considered the evidence that social media in its current forms has deleterious effects on the mental health of teenagers, was their answer to demand that the social media companies alter how they function in order to present their services without the deleterious effects?

No.

Their answer was to ban younger teenagers from using social media.

Restrict the freedoms of children--don't actually do anything substantive to force social media to serve them, and society at large, better. That was their answer.

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/education-training/k-12/cellphones-in-schools

Even in my own country, some provinces have moved to restrict or ban the use of mobile devices in schools, in part to cut down on social media use.

Never mind the autistic child who might have a panic attack and need to call a parent for emotional support. Never mind the kid with a chronic illness who might need to call emergency services if it flares up. (And never mind that the proliferation of mobile phones has led to the removal of payphones that could have been used to call emergency services or make a collect call with a brief message.)

Never mind the teachers who successfully integrated students' use of mobile devices into their lesson plans, having them read about various topics in more depth than the teacher might be able to cover, perhaps even finding sources that provide information of which the teacher was unaware, providing a learning opportunity for everyone in the room.

The answer is never to demand that companies do better by the society in which they exist. The answer is never to say that corporations exist because we allow them to exist, that they can only exist so long as their existence serves the best interests of society.

The answer is always to take away freedoms from the people, and worse, from the most vulnerable among us.

Because it's easier to do that than to demand that rich men do better, because it's easier to do that than confront how past policies led to the current state of affairs, because it's easier to do that than enact actual solutions that enhance human freedom.

"If you end your training now, if you choose the quick and easy path as Vader did, you will become an agent of evil."

"Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny. Consume you it will, as it did Obi-Wan's apprentice."

"If you leave now, help them you could, but you would destroy all for which they have fought and suffered."

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts