Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Harper Thorpe's avatar

I AM THE ENEMY OF POWER

Slandered and abused

Beaten, bruised, but still fighting

For you - I am Truth

Not welcomed by all

To those who would do you harm

I’m the enemy

Behold my allies

Diverse views, skepticism

Inconvenient facts

My foes tell their flocks

“Others will lie to you. I’ll

tell you what to think!”

They’re threatened by me

Their power comes from closed minds

Anger, fear and hate

They will convince you

You didn’t see what you saw

Or hear what you heard

They will vilify

Shout-down, demean and malign

Those who speak for me

Trust your eyes and ears

Trust your power to reason

Trust I am there, but …

May be obscure. There’s

not always a smoking gun.

Sometimes, only smoke

But connect the dots

The proof is in the picture

Yes, that’s me you see

I’ve nothing to hide

I can stand your scrutiny

Because I am Truth

©2020 HHThorpe. All rights reserved.

Expand full comment
Steersman's avatar

> "The patient is our collective capacity to distinguish sense from nonsense, consistency from contradiction, principle from expediency."

Well, you certainly start out well, particularly with that. Entirely consistent with the "age-old" principle -- at least since the 12th century -- of "from contradiction, anything follows" [Latin: ex falso [sequitur] quodlibet]:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion

However, I think you sort of snatch defeat from the jaws of victory when you insist that the US "threatening to abandon NATO allies unless they “pay their bills' " somehow qualifies as a "protection racket". You might have had a point if that was followed shortly thereafter by Luigi, or Ivan, popping into France to break Pierre's kneecaps.

Seems rather clear from that Telegraph article that most of the other NATO countries are falling far short of their contractual obligations. The US is paying some $900 billion for the upkeep of their military whereas all of the other NATO countries are apparently paying, together, only $500 billion:

Telegraph: "Mr. Trump has repeatedly criticised NATO countries for not meeting the current goal of spending two per cent of GDP on defense, arguing that the disparity puts an unfair burden on the United States."

https://archive.ph/VnHxp

One might reasonably decry what is apparently a waste -- should be beating at least some of those swords into plowshares -- but, given those contracts, one might reasonably argue that the US and Trump might well have a point, some reason to be somewhat "peeved".

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts