The Democrats’ Choice: Righteous Anger or Continued Complicity

Why the Party Needs to Channel Patriotic Fury Instead of Consultant-Class Cowardice

Photo by Heidi Kaden on Unsplash

The Democratic Party stands at a crossroads that will determine not just electoral success, but whether American democracy survives oligarchic capture. They can continue with focus-grouped talking points about “kitchen table issues” while oligarchs systematically destroy the democratic institutions that give working families any power over their kitchen tables. Or they can channel the righteous, patriotic anger that this moment demands.

If Democrats want a message that will galvanize support in 2026, here it is: “We see your corruption, your lies, your lawlessness, and we’re coming for you.”

This isn’t hyperbole. This isn’t partisan rage. This is moral clarity about systematic lawbreaking by people who have captured American institutions and are using them to eliminate democratic accountability. The corruption is real. It is historically unprecedented and prodigious in scope. Justice is called for. Unrelenting justice. A promise of reckoning.

Stop Making Simple Things Complicated

The consultant class has trained Democrats to treat all of this as complex messaging challenges, requiring careful analysis of opinion polls, carefully workshopped messages, and a whole bunch of bullshit that makes things a lot more complicated than they need to be.

The political reality is quite simple. They are trying to pull off a coup, consolidate authoritarian power, they are engaging in historical and prodigious kleptocratic theft, and the long arm of justice is what must await them.

When oligarchs program AI systems to praise Hitler—that’s not a “messaging challenge” requiring focus group analysis. It’s Nazi ideology deployed by the richest man in the world. When federal agents arrest American citizens based on appearance—that’s not a “complex enforcement issue” requiring nuanced policy papers. It’s systematic constitutional violation. When billionaires choose fascism over progressive taxation—that’s not an “ideological disagreement” requiring respectful dialogue. It’s treason against democratic governance.

Call it what it is. A coup. Kleptocracy. Systematic betrayal of everything America stands for.

The consultant class wants Democrats to poll-test their response to systematic lawbreaking, to workshop their messaging about constitutional violations, to carefully calibrate their tone when discussing oligarchic theft. This is exactly the kind of procedural fetishism that enables corruption by treating obvious evil as a strategic communications problem.

We’re not facing complex policy disagreements that require sophisticated analysis. We’re facing systematic institutional capture by people who want to eliminate democratic accountability entirely. They’re stealing from disaster victims. They’re deploying federal police against families. They’re programming AI to spread Nazi propaganda. They’re disappearing legal immigrants into foreign prisons.

This doesn’t require careful polling to understand. It doesn’t need focus group testing to respond to. It doesn’t demand workshopped talking points to address. It requires moral clarity: This is wrong. It must stop. Justice must be served.

This Is Not Political Prosecution

The crimes are real. They’re in front of our eyes.

When we promise accountability for oligarchic corruption, we’re not talking about weaponizing the justice system for partisan advantage. We’re talking about prosecuting actual crimes that have been committed in broad daylight with complete impunity.

The systematic theft of disaster relief money—that’s documented kleptocracy, not political disagreement. The deployment of federal police against constitutional rights—those are filmed constitutional violations, not policy disputes. The programming of AI systems to praise Hitler—that’s documented deployment of Nazi ideology, not cultural difference. The disappearance of legal immigrants into foreign prisons—those are documented human rights violations, not immigration enforcement.

These aren’t allegations requiring investigation to establish. These aren’t partisan interpretations of ambiguous behavior. These are documented crimes committed openly by people who believe their wealth and political connections place them beyond accountability.

The oligarchs want to frame any accountability as “political prosecution” because they’ve spent years normalizing the idea that their crimes shouldn’t have consequences. They want Americans to believe that holding powerful people accountable for systematic lawbreaking is somehow illegitimate partisan warfare.

This is projection. They have actually weaponized the justice system for partisan purposes—dismissing charges against political allies, manufacturing cases against political opponents, using federal police as personal enforcement agents. When they cry “political prosecution” about facing consequences for documented crimes, they’re trying to immunize their actual political prosecutions by claiming all prosecutions are political.

The beautiful thing about oligarchic arrogance is that they’ve committed most of their crimes in public. The constitutional violations are documented. The theft is recorded. The systematic corruption is filmed and broadcast. The evidence isn’t hidden in classified files or secret communications—it’s in press conferences, social media posts, and official government operations conducted in broad daylight.

Righteous Anger as Patriotic Duty

Democratic voters are exhausted by procedural politeness in the face of systematic corruption. They want permission to feel the appropriate moral response to obvious evil. They want leaders who match the moral urgency of the moment rather than treating oligarchic capture as just another political challenge requiring careful messaging.

Righteous anger isn’t partisan—it’s patriotic. When oligarchs violate constitutional rights, steal disaster relief money to fund detention centers, and deploy federal police against families, the absence of anger would be moral cowardice. When they systematically corrupt democratic institutions while lecturing about “efficiency,” fury is the only appropriate response.

This anger has historical precedent. It’s the moral force of Lincoln confronting slavery, FDR confronting economic royalists, civil rights activists confronting segregation. Not because the specific issues are identical, but because the fundamental dynamic is the same: systematic corruption of American institutions requires systematic response.

Democratic voters don’t need carefully calibrated messages about oligarchic corruption—they need leaders with the moral courage to call corruption “corruption” and promise to stop it. They don’t need poll-tested responses to systematic lawbreaking—they need the promise that lawbreakers will face consequences regardless of their wealth or political connections.

The Epstein Cover-Up Reveals Everything

Nothing illustrates oligarchic corruption more perfectly than the Jeffrey Epstein case. For months, Attorney General Pam Bondi made specific claims about evidence. She told Fox News that a “client list” was “sitting on my desk right now to review.” She claimed there were “tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.” She suggested officials were withholding evidence to “protect a lot of names and individuals.”

Now, suddenly, the Justice Department claims none of this evidence exists. No client list. No blackmail videos. No compromising materials about powerful figures. How remarkably convenient for an administration that promised Epstein transparency while controlling the very files that might implicate their own leadership.

We cannot trust these claims. This is the same Justice Department that has systematically violated constitutional rights and operated as Donald Trump’s personal law firm rather than America’s justice system. Either Bondi was lying when she claimed to have client lists and videos, or the DOJ is lying now when they claim these materials don’t exist. Both possibilities reveal systematic corruption that demands investigation.

The idea that Jeffrey Epstein—a man who trafficked children for decades while operating in elite circles—kept no records of his powerful clients defies basic logic. The notion that a systematic blackmail operation left no evidence of blackmail is absurd on its face.

Democrats should flatly reject the DOJ’s convenient conclusions and promise that independent investigators will examine every piece of Epstein-related evidence with no deference to prior Justice Department claims. When we return to power, every document related to Jeffrey Epstein will be released by independent investigators operating outside the same institutions that now claim evidence doesn’t exist.

The Scale Demands Historical Response

What we’re witnessing isn’t normal political corruption that requires normal political remedies. This is systematic institutional capture that operates at a scale unprecedented in American history. Oligarchs have built parallel systems of governance designed to operate beyond democratic constraint. They’ve captured courts, corrupted enforcement agencies, and deployed technological infrastructure to make traditional accountability mechanisms irrelevant.

The response must match the threat. Half-measures aren’t prudent—they’re surrender. You cannot heal a wound while the knife is still twisting. You cannot have unity with people actively destroying democratic accountability. You cannot have normal politics with systematic lawbreakers.

Real law and order means that crimes have consequences regardless of who commits them. It means that constitutional violations are prosecuted whether they’re committed by street criminals or billionaire oligarchs. It means that theft is theft whether you steal a car or steal disaster relief money. It means that systematic lawbreaking faces systematic accountability.

Beyond Kitchen Table Euphemisms

The consultant class wants Democrats to focus on grocery prices and gas costs while oligarchs systematically destroy the democratic framework that gives working families any power over economic policy. This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of what voters actually want.

People understand intuitively that protecting democracy is a kitchen table issue. Without democratic institutions, working families have no power over anything that affects their lives. When oligarchs capture regulatory agencies, courts, and enforcement mechanisms, grocery prices become whatever oligarchs decide they should be. When billionaires can buy elections and write their own tax laws, working families lose any meaningful voice in economic policy.

You can’t separate economic justice from democratic justice because oligarchic capture makes both impossible. Fighting for democracy isn’t abstract idealism—it’s practical necessity for anyone who isn’t wealthy enough to buy their own political system.

Promise Systematic Justice

Democrats need to stop talking about “healing” and “moving forward” with systematic lawbreakers. Promise accountability. Promise investigations. Promise prosecutions. Promise wealth confiscation through legal taxation. Promise to dismantle the infrastructure oligarchs have built to operate beyond democratic oversight.

Make it personal. Name names. Call out specific oligarchs, specific violations, specific acts of systematic lawbreaking. Make it impossible for voters to view this as abstract policy debate rather than concrete moral emergency.

Promise complete investigation into every institution that enabled oligarchic capture. Every bank that processed stolen money. Every law enforcement agency that gave special treatment to billionaire criminals. Every prosecutor who negotiated sweetheart deals. Every judge who created doctrines of presumptive presidential immunity.

The Epstein case perfectly illustrates the broader principle: extreme wealth cannot grant immunity from democratic accountability. When billionaires can traffic children, program AI to praise Hitler, steal disaster relief money, and deploy federal police against families—all while facing minimal consequences—you don’t have rule of law. You have rule by wealth.

Democrats should promise to end oligarchic impunity systematically. Promise that being rich and connected will no longer protect systematic lawbreakers from facing consequences. This isn’t about partisan advantage—it’s about whether American institutions serve justice or protect wealth.

The Promise of Reckoning

When Democrats return to power, every oligarch who has systematically violated constitutional rights will face prosecution. Every institution that has been captured will be reformed or replaced. Every judge who created immunity doctrines for presidential criminals will be impeached. The infrastructure of oligarchic governance will be dismantled systematically and without apology.

Campaign finance laws will be enforced. Wealth taxes will be implemented. Antitrust prosecutions will proceed without regard to oligarchic pressure. Constitutional violations will be prosecuted regardless of wealth or political connections.

This is not a threat—it’s a promise. The promise of democratic justice applied with the full moral force that systematic betrayal of American principles demands. The promise that extreme wealth will no longer grant immunity from democratic accountability. The promise that constitutional rights will be protected regardless of oligarchic convenience.

The Choice Before Democrats

Democratic voters are ready for this message. They’re ready to channel patriotic fury against systematic lawbreaking. They’re ready to demand genuine accountability rather than performative concern. They’re ready to fight for democracy with the moral urgency that the moment demands.

The question is whether Democratic leadership has the courage to deliver this message and the commitment to follow through. Whether they’ll continue treating oligarchic treason as a messaging challenge or recognize it as the existential threat it represents.

The corruption is systematic. The lawbreaking is obvious. The threat to democracy is immediate. The response must be unrelenting, uncompromising, and unashamed.

We see your corruption, your lies, your lawlessness. We see your convenient cover-ups and your systematic betrayal of American principles. We see your transformation of democratic institutions into instruments of oligarchic power.

We are coming for you. Justice and truth are coming back to America. Forgiveness is not on the agenda.