The Cult Member in Charge of American Intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard is a National Security Emergency
I need to tell you something that should terrify every American who cares about national security: we have placed a cult member in charge of our intelligence apparatus, and she is actively working to undermine American foreign policy while having access to our nation's most sensitive secrets.
Tulsi Gabbard's recent unauthorized video warning against supporting Israel's operations against Iran wasn't just policy disagreement or cabinet infighting. It was the behavior of someone whose fundamental loyalties lie elsewhere—someone whose decision-making framework has been shaped not by American interests but by the ideological conditioning of the Science of Identity Foundation, the cult that has controlled her worldview since childhood.
This isn't speculation. This isn't guilt by association. This is pattern recognition of someone who has consistently positioned herself against American interests while defending authoritarian regimes—and who now has access to every classified assessment, every intelligence operation, every sensitive source and method that keeps America safe.
Look at Gabbard's record with clear eyes. On Syria, she secretly met with Bashar al-Assad in 2017, then spent years defending a dictator who used chemical weapons against his own people while parroting Assad regime talking points about "regime change wars." On Ukraine, she consistently opposed aid to Ukraine, repeated Russian propaganda about "biolabs," and refused to call Putin a war criminal even as he conducted a genocidal invasion of a democratic nation. On Iran, now as Director of National Intelligence, she's actively working to prevent American support for Israeli operations against the Iranian regime—the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism.
In each case, her position serves authoritarian interests while weakening democratic allies. This isn't coincidence. This is the consistent application of an anti-American worldview shaped by decades of cult conditioning.
The Science of Identity Foundation, led by Chris Butler, isn't just another fringe religious group. It's a cult that has systematically programmed Gabbard since childhood to view Western democratic institutions as illegitimate and corrupt. Butler's teachings promote isolationism, anti-interventionism, and deep skepticism of American power—exactly the worldview Gabbard brings to her role as America's top intelligence official.
Cult members don't operate according to normal institutional logic. They operate according to the leader's directives and the cult's ideology, which always supersedes professional duties, national loyalty, or rational analysis. This explains behavior that seems erratic from a normal political perspective but makes perfect sense from a cultic one.
The most damning evidence came on June 10, when Gabbard released an unauthorized video at 5:30 AM warning that "political elite and warmongers" were bringing the world to "the brink of nuclear annihilation." The timing wasn't accidental—it came just days after Israel hawks met with Trump to lobby for supporting Israeli operations against Iran.
Trump's reaction was telling. He became "incensed" at her unauthorized intervention, telling associates she had "spoken out of turn" and expressing his disapproval directly to her. This isn't how normal cabinet members behave. This is someone whose ideological programming compelled her to sabotage her own administration's foreign policy deliberations.
Normal political actors don't undermine their own president through rogue social media posts. Cult members do when their conditioning conflicts with institutional loyalty.
Consider what Gabbard has access to as Director of National Intelligence: every classified assessment about Iranian nuclear capabilities, all intelligence on Israeli military operations, sensitive sources and methods across the intelligence community, real-time information about American allies' vulnerabilities, details of ongoing counterintelligence operations.
She has used this position to fire officials who produced assessments that contradicted Trump's political narratives. She has revoked security clearances of political opponents. She has publicly undermined intelligence community findings that don't align with her ideological preferences. And now she's actively working to prevent American support for operations against Iran—the regime that has been plotting to assassinate American officials, funding terrorist proxies across the Middle East, and racing toward nuclear weapons capability.
When someone consistently positions themselves against American interests while defending authoritarian regimes, when they have been shaped by an anti-American ideology since childhood, when they operate according to cultic rather than institutional logic—what do you call that person? You call them a foreign asset. Not necessarily a recruited spy, but someone whose worldview and actions serve hostile interests regardless of their conscious intentions.
Gabbard's pattern is unmistakable: defend dictators like Assad, oppose support for democratic allies like Ukraine, undermine operations against terrorist-sponsoring regimes like Iran, use intelligence position to serve political rather than national security purposes. Each position weakens America while strengthening our adversaries. Each action serves the interests of authoritarian regimes while undermining democratic values and allies.
Perhaps most telling is Gabbard's recent statement that she won't "rule out any opportunity to serve my country" when asked about running for president in 2028. She's already using her intelligence position to build a political platform while actively undermining the administration she supposedly serves. This isn't public service—it's the exploitation of America's intelligence apparatus for personal political gain while serving an ideology fundamentally hostile to American interests.
We are witnessing something unprecedented in American history: a cult member with access to our nation's most sensitive intelligence actively working to undermine American foreign policy according to an anti-American ideology shaped by decades of cultic conditioning.
This isn't about policy disagreements. Democrats and Republicans can legitimately disagree about foreign policy approaches while maintaining loyalty to American interests. This is about someone whose fundamental worldview has been programmed to see American power as illegitimate and American allies as unworthy of support.
The danger isn't just that she might leak classified information—though that's certainly possible. The danger is that she's systematically working to weaken American influence, undermine democratic allies, and serve the interests of authoritarian regimes while having access to the intelligence that could make such efforts devastatingly effective.
Even Trump recognizes the problem. His public dismissal of her Iran assessment—"I don't care what she said"—reveals his loss of confidence in his own intelligence chief. Reports suggest he's considering abolishing her office entirely, folding its functions into other agencies. But the damage is already done. She has had months of access to America's most sensitive secrets. She knows our capabilities, our limitations, our sources, our methods. That knowledge doesn't disappear when she leaves office—it goes with her, shaped by an ideology that views American institutions as fundamentally illegitimate.
Gabbard's case reveals a deeper vulnerability in our system: we have no effective screening for ideological reliability at the highest levels of government. We conduct extensive background checks for security clearances, but we don't adequately assess whether someone's fundamental worldview aligns with American interests.
Cult programming is particularly dangerous because it operates below the level of conscious awareness. Gabbard may genuinely believe she's serving American interests while consistently taking positions that undermine them. The conditioning runs so deep that contradictory evidence gets filtered out or reinterpreted to fit the programmed worldview. This is why cults are so dangerous in positions of power—they create true believers who can justify any betrayal as service to a higher cause.
Gabbard must be removed from her position immediately. Not through the slow process of bureaucratic restructuring, but through direct action that acknowledges the clear and present danger she represents. Every intelligence assessment she has touched must be reviewed. Every operation she has had access to must be evaluated for compromise. Every source she knows about must be considered potentially exposed.
And we must fundamentally rethink how we screen for ideological reliability at the highest levels of government. Having the right clearance isn't enough when someone's fundamental loyalties lie elsewhere.
This isn't just about one dangerous appointment. It's about whether America can protect itself from infiltration by those whose ideologies are fundamentally hostile to democratic values and American interests. When cult members can rise to control our intelligence apparatus, when foreign assets can masquerade as public servants, when anti-American ideologies can capture positions of trust—our entire system of national security becomes compromised.
Two plus two equals four. There are twenty-four hours in a day. And Tulsi Gabbard is a clear and present danger to American national security whether we have the courage to admit it or not.
The center cannot be held when those charged with defending it are actively working to undermine it. The wire cannot be walked when those who should be helping maintain it are systematically weakening its supports.
Name it plainly: we have a cult member in charge of American intelligence, and she is serving interests that are not our own. Every minute she remains in position is another minute of potential compromise, another opportunity for our most sensitive secrets to be filtered through an ideology that views American power as inherently illegitimate.
This is not normal political disagreement. This is not cabinet infighting. This is a national security emergency that demands immediate action.
Remove her. Investigate the damage. Reform the system. Before it's too late.
Remember what's real.
The intelligence community itself came to the conclusion that Iran does not have an active nuclear weapons program. Tulsi testified to Congress those conclusions in March. They aren’t her deranged ideas, they are what our intelligence agencies and the IAEA have concluded. We are being lied into another war.
I have to admit this post surprises me. It sounds as if you are for another useless war.